London’s latest silver vault increase raises a practical question for futures investors: how much confidence does today’s physical-market backdrop offer before a historically favorable seasonal window?[1][4]

The November 4–February 2 period finished higher in all seven selected midterm-election years spanning 1998–2022. Yet only 55.0% of the 2006–2025 windows favored the long direction, qualifying that strength before the approaching 2026–2027 window.[4]

London’s dated signals

The LBMA’s September 7 release put end-August silver holdings at 28,431 tonnes, up 0.77% from July.[1]

July’s daily average clearing volume, value and transfer count fell, while ounces per transfer rose. These net physical-metal transfers among four London market-maker banks measure a different month and activity from August holdings, not futures demand. The chart compares July with June.[2]

On September 16, the Fed raised its target range a quarter-point to 3.75%–4%, citing elevated inflation. This is policy background, without an established effect on future silver returns.[3]

The evidence

July London silver clearing fell across three measures

Daily averages; month-over-month changes reported by the LBMA

July London silver clearing fell across three measures. Units: percent month-over-month. Ounces transferred: -3.8; Transfer value: -15.6; Number of transfers: -25.6
These are physical London clearing measures, not silver futures returns. July clearing and August vault holdings cover different periods.Source: LBMA Net Clearing Data (Daily Averages): July 2026.
View chart data & download
July London silver clearing fell across three measures · percent month-over-month
MeasureValuePeriodStatus
Ounces transferred-3.8July 2026reported
Transfer value-15.6July 2026reported
Number of transfers-25.6July 2026reported

CSV data · Full-size vector chart

What the midterms show

TradeWave’s selected seasonal record gives a median full-window long result of 8.42% before costs. Seven observations make an interesting timing question, but cannot establish attainable futures profits.[4]

SI2026-11-04 to 2027-02-02 · 91 calendar days7 selected midterm-election years (1998–2022)

The year-by-year seasonal record

SI: the selected seasonal record. Each bar shows the price change from the start to the end of the same seasonal period. Green means higher; red means lower. The dashed line marks TradeWave’s median full-window result of 8.42%. 7 selected midterm-election years (1998–2022)
Each bar shows the price change from the start to the end of the same seasonal period. Green means higher; red means lower. The dashed line marks TradeWave’s median full-window result of 8.42%.
View exact TradeWave observations and download
Window starting yearEnding price changeHighest from entryLowest from entry
1998+10.64%+10.79%-7.22%
2002+7.76%+10.32%-1.83%
2006+4.82%+12.62%-5.21%
2010+8.62%+20.09%-4.08%
2014+8.14%+16.00%-11.27%
2018+8.42%+10.34%-5.21%
2022+13.90%+19.00%-1.85%
Download TradeWave observations

Gains can conceal discomfort

The yearly range chart shows each year’s same seasonal period. November 4, 2014–February 2, 2015 illustrates why endings alone mislead: it gained 8.14% but traded 11.27% below the starting price. The highs and lows reveal neither their order nor a peak-to-trough drawdown.[4]

What happened inside each seasonal window

SI: yearly seasonal range. Each year shows the same seasonal period. Bars show the price change at its end. Thin lines show the highest and lowest changes from the starting price during that period. The lines do not tell us which move came first or measure a fall from a peak. They are not suggested stop-loss levels. The dashed line marks TradeWave’s median full-window result of 8.42%. 7 selected midterm-election years (1998–2022)
Each year shows the same seasonal period. Bars show the price change at its end. Thin lines show the highest and lowest changes from the starting price during that period. The lines do not tell us which move came first or measure a fall from a peak. They are not suggested stop-loss levels. The dashed line marks TradeWave’s median full-window result of 8.42%.
View exact TradeWave observations and download
Window starting yearEnding price changeHighest from entryLowest from entry
1998+10.64%+10.79%-7.22%
2002+7.76%+10.32%-1.83%
2006+4.82%+12.62%-5.21%
2010+8.62%+20.09%-4.08%
2014+8.14%+16.00%-11.27%
2018+8.42%+10.34%-5.21%
2022+13.90%+19.00%-1.85%
Download TradeWave observations

Checking across all years

Broader checks test whether midterm strength carries across all years. The 2006–2025 long median was 1.2%, versus the selected midterms’ 8.42%. The 2016–2025 study selected short: its positive 1.32% median means falling prices favored that direction, but its all-window average was -7.76%. Both comparisons reuse selected midterms; the recent decade also sits inside the longer history. Their differences weaken confidence, without proving an election effect or providing independent confirmation.[4]

See the history behind this comparison

TradeWave checks the same seasonal dates across different sets of years. This helps show whether the pattern holds up when you look at another stretch of history.

HistoryObserved start yearsDirectionSuccess rateMedian result
Article study: 7 selected midterm-election years (1998–2022)1998, 2002, 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018, 2022long100.0%8.42%
10 consecutive historical windows (2016–2025)2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025short60.0%1.32%
20 consecutive historical windows (2006–2025)2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025long55.0%1.2%

Some years appear in more than one group, so agreement is not an independent test. A requested lookback can extend beyond available history; the observed years are listed above. Election-cycle groups use matching phases, not consecutive years. Results follow the direction shown: a positive short result means prices fell. Small samples and different market periods make the comparison less conclusive.

Before November 4

Before November 4, inspect this window’s outcomes across histories in TradeWave. Recorded prices end October 2, so they cannot establish future entry conditions. The illustration below uses this article’s seven selected midterm years, superimposing a section of TradeWave’s seasonal trend scaled to the last recorded price for the next 60 weekdays, October 5–December 25. That separate horizon illustrates historical shape, not a price target or forecast for the full window ending February 2, 2027.[4]

Price history and the seasonal outlook

SI recorded prices and TradeWave seasonal illustration. Blue shows recorded prices through 2026-10-02. The amber line overlays a section of TradeWave's seasonal trend, scaled to the last recorded price, using 7 selected midterm-election years (1998–2022). Its displayed dates are 2026-10-05 to 2026-12-25; covering the next 60 weekdays. That is a different horizon from the full seasonal window above. It illustrates the historical seasonal shape, not a price target or forecast.
Blue shows recorded prices through 2026-10-02. The amber line overlays a section of TradeWave's seasonal trend, scaled to the last recorded price, using 7 selected midterm-election years (1998–2022). Its displayed dates are 2026-10-05 to 2026-12-25; covering the next 60 weekdays. That is a different horizon from the full seasonal window above. It illustrates the historical seasonal shape, not a price target or forecast.

Download the TradeWave chart points

About this seasonal analysis

7 selected midterm-election years (1998–2022). The selected dates, years, direction, returns and ranges come from TradeWave. When a window boundary is a weekend or market holiday, TradeWave uses the next available trading session. SMN displays the returned results without recalculating them. A year label identifies the start of the historical window; a window can end in the following calendar year.

Green and red bars show the underlying adjusted-price movement. The range endpoints measure changes from the entry price, not a peak-to-trough loss. Historical results are before trading costs and do not guarantee future performance.

TradeWave data methodology · The 100-Year Pattern

Sources & methodology

  1. London Gold and Silver Vault Data for August 2026 · 2026-09-07
  2. LBMA Net Clearing Data (Daily Averages): July 2026 · 2026-09-01
  3. Federal Reserve issues FOMC statement · 2026-09-16
  4. TradeWave SI seasonal evidence · 2026-10-05