NVIDIA investors face a practical question: how much profit can stronger AI sales deliver when management expects lower margins and higher expenses?[1]

That question accompanies the approaching October 29–November 7, 2026 window. TradeWave’s six selected midterm years spanning 2002–2022 all finished higher, although broader histories include losses. What does the business outlook establish before that favorable seasonal stretch?[4]

Revenue growth, narrower margins

NVIDIA’s August 26 release reported fiscal second-quarter revenue of $96.2 billion, up 106% year over year, for the quarter ended July 26, 2026. Data Center contributed $89.0 billion, up 117%. Management cited broader AI infrastructure demand.[1]

Fiscal third-quarter 2027 revenue guidance is $108.0 billion, plus or minus 2%, assuming no Data Center compute revenue from China. Both GAAP and non-GAAP gross margins are forecast at 74.0%, plus or minus 50 basis points, versus 75.0% each in Q2.[1]

Forecast operating expenses are about $9.2 billion GAAP and $9.0 billion non-GAAP, versus Q2’s $8.408 billion and $8.232 billion, respectively. Higher sales must also absorb rising costs.[1]

The evidence

NVIDIA’s reported fiscal second-quarter revenue by business area

Quarter ended July 26, 2026

NVIDIA’s reported fiscal second-quarter revenue by business area. Units: USD billions. Data Center: 89; Edge Computing: 7.2
Reported business revenue from NVIDIA’s August 26 release; these are not forecasts or seasonal returns.Source: NVIDIA Announces Financial Results for Second Quarter Fiscal 2027.
View chart data & download
NVIDIA’s reported fiscal second-quarter revenue by business area · USD billions
MeasureValuePeriodStatus
Data Center89Q2 FY2027, ended 2026-07-26reported
Edge Computing7.2Q2 FY2027, ended 2026-07-26reported

CSV data · Full-size vector chart

A favorable but small sample

TradeWave’s seasonal record shows a 5.64% median full-window gain versus a 12.02% all-window average. The 36.36% gain in 2002 helps explain that gap. Six observations cannot establish an election effect.[4]

NVDA2026-10-29 to 2026-11-07 · 10 calendar days6 selected midterm-election years (2002–2022)

The year-by-year seasonal record

NVDA: the selected seasonal record. Each bar shows the price change from the start to the end of the same seasonal period. Green means higher; red means lower. The dashed line marks TradeWave’s median full-window result of 5.64%. 6 selected midterm-election years (2002–2022)
Each bar shows the price change from the start to the end of the same seasonal period. Green means higher; red means lower. The dashed line marks TradeWave’s median full-window result of 5.64%.
View exact TradeWave observations and download
Window starting yearEnding price changeHighest from entryLowest from entry
2002+36.36%+54.77%+0.00%
2006+4.06%+6.40%-3.82%
2010+5.31%+6.24%-0.65%
2014+5.24%+10.00%-1.90%
2018+15.18%+19.60%-0.00%
2022+5.96%+6.78%-4.01%
Download TradeWave observations

What a winning finish conceals

The yearly range chart covers the same seasonal period each year, not whole calendar years. October 29–November 7, 2022 illustrates why finishing higher differs from a comfortable holding period: shares gained 5.96% but traded 4.01% below the starting price. Highs and lows reveal neither their order nor peak-to-trough losses.[4]

What happened inside each seasonal window

NVDA: yearly seasonal range. Each year shows the same seasonal period. Bars show the price change at its end. Thin lines show the highest and lowest changes from the starting price during that period. The lines do not tell us which move came first or measure a fall from a peak. They are not suggested stop-loss levels. The dashed line marks TradeWave’s median full-window result of 5.64%. 6 selected midterm-election years (2002–2022)
Each year shows the same seasonal period. Bars show the price change at its end. Thin lines show the highest and lowest changes from the starting price during that period. The lines do not tell us which move came first or measure a fall from a peak. They are not suggested stop-loss levels. The dashed line marks TradeWave’s median full-window result of 5.64%.
View exact TradeWave observations and download
Window starting yearEnding price changeHighest from entryLowest from entry
2002+36.36%+54.77%+0.00%
2006+4.06%+6.40%-3.82%
2010+5.31%+6.24%-0.65%
2014+5.24%+10.00%-1.90%
2018+15.18%+19.60%-0.00%
2022+5.96%+6.78%-4.01%
Download TradeWave observations

Broader histories retain losses

Checks across all years broaden the perspective: 2016–2025 produced nine gains in ten windows, versus 17 in 20 for 2006–2025. Favorable does not mean loss-free. They reuse 2018 and 2022, and every selected midterm year except 2002, respectively. The shorter history also sits within the longer one, limiting independent confirmation.[4]

See the history behind this comparison

TradeWave checks the same seasonal dates across different sets of years. This helps show whether the pattern holds up when you look at another stretch of history.

HistoryObserved start yearsDirectionSuccess rateMedian result
Article study: 6 selected midterm-election years (2002–2022)2002, 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018, 2022long100.0%5.64%
10 consecutive historical windows (2016–2025)2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025long90.0%5.03%
20 consecutive historical windows (2006–2025)2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025long85.0%5.3%

Some years appear in more than one group, so agreement is not an independent test. A requested lookback can extend beyond available history; the observed years are listed above. Election-cycle groups use matching phases, not consecutive years. Results follow the direction shown: a positive short result means prices fell. Small samples and different market periods make the comparison less conclusive.

Before October 29

At entry, inspect this window’s range of outcomes across TradeWave histories. Recorded prices end October 13, 2026; they cannot establish entry conditions. The following chart overlays this article’s six selected years’ normalized average seasonal path for the next 60 weekdays, October 14, 2026–January 5, 2027. Those future dates belong only to the historical illustration, a separate horizon from the seasonal window, not a forecast or price target.[4]

Price history and the seasonal outlook

NVDA recorded prices and TradeWave seasonal illustration. Blue shows recorded prices through 2026-10-13. The amber line overlays a section of TradeWave's seasonal trend, scaled to the last recorded price, using 6 selected midterm-election years (2002–2022). Its displayed dates are 2026-10-14 to 2027-01-05; covering the next 60 weekdays. That is a different horizon from the full seasonal window above. It illustrates the historical seasonal shape, not a price target or forecast.
Blue shows recorded prices through 2026-10-13. The amber line overlays a section of TradeWave's seasonal trend, scaled to the last recorded price, using 6 selected midterm-election years (2002–2022). Its displayed dates are 2026-10-14 to 2027-01-05; covering the next 60 weekdays. That is a different horizon from the full seasonal window above. It illustrates the historical seasonal shape, not a price target or forecast.

Download the TradeWave chart points

About this seasonal analysis

6 selected midterm-election years (2002–2022). The selected dates, years, direction, returns and ranges come from TradeWave. When a window boundary is a weekend or market holiday, TradeWave uses the next available trading session. SMN displays the returned results without recalculating them. A year label identifies the start of the historical window; a window can end in the following calendar year.

Green and red bars show the underlying adjusted-price movement. The range endpoints measure changes from the entry price, not a peak-to-trough loss. Historical results are before trading costs and do not guarantee future performance.

TradeWave data methodology · The 100-Year Pattern

Sources & methodology

  1. NVIDIA Announces Financial Results for Second Quarter Fiscal 2027 · 2026-08-26
  2. FORM 10-Q · 2026-08-26
  3. Productive, Durable, Fungible: How NVIDIA AI Factories Maximize Return on Investment · 2026-10-01
  4. TradeWave NVDA seasonal evidence · 2026-10-14